Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Case regulation is specific into the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For example, a ruling in a California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
If your DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and continue according into the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
This is because transfer orders are typically deemed within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the right forum. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it demands legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be manufactured and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Summaries offer a concise insight into the realm of dispute resolution exterior traditional court proceedings. In Pakistan, arbitration serves as an important alternative for resolving commercial conflicts quickly and proficiently.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or girl usually do not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, providing a valuable resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
Article 27 with the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the obvious negation with the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided through the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered because of the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the uncovered counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this element for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if more info she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.